| |
|
|
| Registros recuperados : 2 | |
| 2. |  | DI SALVO, L.; GARCÍA, J.E.; PUENTE, M.L.; AMIGO, J.; ANRIQUEZ, A.; BARLOCCO, C.; BENINTENDE, S.; BOCHATAY, T.; BORTOLATO, M.; CASSÁN, F.; CASTAÑO, C.; CATAFESTA, M.; CONIGLIO, A.; DÍAZ, M.; GALIÁN, L.R.; GALLACE, E.; GARCÍA, P.; GARCÍA DE SALAMONE, I.E.; LANDA, M.; LIERNUR, G.; MANEIRO, M.L.; MASSA, R.; MALINVERNI, J.; MARCHESSI, N.; MONTELEONE, E.; OVIEDO, S.; POBLITI, L.; PORTELA, G.; RADOVANCICH, D; RIGHES, S.; ROCHA, R.; RODRÍGUEZ CÁCERES, E.; ROSSI, A.; SANTELLA, G.; TORTORA, M.L.; TREJO, N.; VALENZUELA, J.A.; VALLEJO, D. The drop plate method as an alternative for Azospirillum spp viable cell enumeration within the consensus protocol of the REDCAI network. (Brief report). [La técnica de la microgota como alternativa para el recuento de Azospirillum spp. dentro del protocolo de la Red de Control de Calidad de Inoculantes (REDCAI).] Revista Argentina de Microbiología, 2022, Volume 54, Issue 2, Pages 152-157. OPEN ACCESS. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ram.2021.05.002 Article history: Received 24 November 2020, Accepted 12 May 2021, Available online 7 July 2021. -- Corresponding author. M.L. Puente, e-mail address: puente.mariana@inta.gob.ar -- LICENSE: Este es un artículo Open Access bajo la licencia...| Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
|    |
| Registros recuperados : 2 | |
|
|
|
|
Registro completo
|
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Las Brujas. |
|
Fecha actual : |
15/06/2023 |
|
Actualizado : |
15/06/2023 |
|
Autor : |
BERVEJILLO, J.; ALSTON, J.M.; TUMBER, K.P. |
|
Afiliación : |
JOSÉ E. BERVEJILLO; JULIAN M. ALSTON, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of California, Davis, United States; Robert Mondavi Institute Center for Wine Economics, University of California, Davis, United States; KABIR P. TUMBER, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of California, Davis, United States. |
|
Título : |
The benefits from public agricultural research in Uruguay. |
|
Fecha de publicación : |
2012 |
|
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics. 2012, Volume 56, Issue 4, Pages 475-497. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8489.2012.00599.x -- OPEN ACCESS. |
|
ISSN : |
1364-985X (print); 1467-8489 (online). |
|
DOI : |
10.1111/j.1467-8489.2012.00599.x |
|
Idioma : |
Inglés |
|
Notas : |
Article history: First published 20 July 2012; Published online 13 September 2012. -- Correspondence author: Alston, J.M., Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of California, United States; email:julian@primal.ucdavis.edu -- Document type: Article-Green Open Access. -- |
|
Contenido : |
ABSTRACT.- We use newly constructed data to model and measure agricultural productivity growth and the returns to public agricultural research conducted in Uruguay over the period 1961-2010. We pay attention specifically to the role of levy-based funding under INIA, which was established in 1990. Our results indicate that the creation of INIA was associated with a revitalization of funding for agricultural R&D in Uruguay, which spurred sustained growth in agricultural productivity during the past two decades when productivity growth was stagnating in many other countries. The econometric results were somewhat sensitive to specification choices. The preferred model includes two other variables with common trends, a time-trend variable and a proxy for private research impacts, as well as a variable representing the stock of public agricultural knowledge that entailed a lag distribution with a peak impact at year 24 of the 25-year lag. It implies a marginal benefit-cost ratio of 48.2, using a real discount rate of 5 per cent per annum and a modified internal rate of return of 24 per cent per annum. The benefit-cost ratio varied significantly across models with different lag structures or that omitted the trend or the private research variable, but across the same models, the modified internal rate of return was very stable, ranging from 23 per cent per annum to 27 per cent per annum. These results suggest that the revitalized investment in research spending under INIA has been very profitable for Uruguay and that a greater rate of investment would have been justified. © 2012 The Authors. AJARE © 2012 Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society Inc. and Blackwell Publishing Asia Pty Ltd. MenosABSTRACT.- We use newly constructed data to model and measure agricultural productivity growth and the returns to public agricultural research conducted in Uruguay over the period 1961-2010. We pay attention specifically to the role of levy-based funding under INIA, which was established in 1990. Our results indicate that the creation of INIA was associated with a revitalization of funding for agricultural R&D in Uruguay, which spurred sustained growth in agricultural productivity during the past two decades when productivity growth was stagnating in many other countries. The econometric results were somewhat sensitive to specification choices. The preferred model includes two other variables with common trends, a time-trend variable and a proxy for private research impacts, as well as a variable representing the stock of public agricultural knowledge that entailed a lag distribution with a peak impact at year 24 of the 25-year lag. It implies a marginal benefit-cost ratio of 48.2, using a real discount rate of 5 per cent per annum and a modified internal rate of return of 24 per cent per annum. The benefit-cost ratio varied significantly across models with different lag structures or that omitted the trend or the private research variable, but across the same models, the modified internal rate of return was very stable, ranging from 23 per cent per annum to 27 per cent per annum. These results suggest that the revitalized investment in research spending under INIA has been ... Presentar Todo |
|
Palabras claves : |
Agricultural productivity; Levy-based funding; Public agricultural R&D; Rates of return; Uruguay. |
|
Asunto categoría : |
A50 Investigación agraria |
|
URL : |
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdfdirect/10.1111/j.1467-8489.2012.00599.x
|
|
Marc : |
LEADER 02848naa a2200241 a 4500
001 1064192
005 2023-06-15
008 2012 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
022 $a1364-985X (print); 1467-8489 (online).
024 7 $a10.1111/j.1467-8489.2012.00599.x$2DOI
100 1 $aBERVEJILLO, J.
245 $aThe benefits from public agricultural research in Uruguay.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2012
500 $aArticle history: First published 20 July 2012; Published online 13 September 2012. -- Correspondence author: Alston, J.M., Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of California, United States; email:julian@primal.ucdavis.edu -- Document type: Article-Green Open Access. --
520 $aABSTRACT.- We use newly constructed data to model and measure agricultural productivity growth and the returns to public agricultural research conducted in Uruguay over the period 1961-2010. We pay attention specifically to the role of levy-based funding under INIA, which was established in 1990. Our results indicate that the creation of INIA was associated with a revitalization of funding for agricultural R&D in Uruguay, which spurred sustained growth in agricultural productivity during the past two decades when productivity growth was stagnating in many other countries. The econometric results were somewhat sensitive to specification choices. The preferred model includes two other variables with common trends, a time-trend variable and a proxy for private research impacts, as well as a variable representing the stock of public agricultural knowledge that entailed a lag distribution with a peak impact at year 24 of the 25-year lag. It implies a marginal benefit-cost ratio of 48.2, using a real discount rate of 5 per cent per annum and a modified internal rate of return of 24 per cent per annum. The benefit-cost ratio varied significantly across models with different lag structures or that omitted the trend or the private research variable, but across the same models, the modified internal rate of return was very stable, ranging from 23 per cent per annum to 27 per cent per annum. These results suggest that the revitalized investment in research spending under INIA has been very profitable for Uruguay and that a greater rate of investment would have been justified. © 2012 The Authors. AJARE © 2012 Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society Inc. and Blackwell Publishing Asia Pty Ltd.
653 $aAgricultural productivity
653 $aLevy-based funding
653 $aPublic agricultural R&D
653 $aRates of return
653 $aUruguay
700 1 $aALSTON, J.M.
700 1 $aTUMBER, K.P.
773 $tAustralian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics. 2012, Volume 56, Issue 4, Pages 475-497. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8489.2012.00599.x -- OPEN ACCESS.
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original : |
INIA Las Brujas (LB) |
|
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
| Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|
